CQ WW DX Contest CW 2014 Raw Scores

The Raw Scores for the CQ WW DX Contest CW 2014 are now available at http://www.cqww.com/raw.htm?mode=cw

The raw scores are for logs received as of 2100 UTC on December 7, 2014. We had 7,250 logs received at that time.  Additional updates will be made each week as more logs are received. Checklogs are not listed in the raw scores.

The raw scores are calculated by the CQWW log checking software before log checking with duplicate contacts removed. The score generated by your logging program and ours may have slight differences due to country files and some contacts not being accepted. If you see a large difference, please report this to questions@cww.com.

If you do not see your log in the raw scores, first confirm that the log has been received by visiting http://www.cqww.com/logs_received_cw.htm

Thanks to everyone who participated or submitted a log for the contest. We enjoyed some of the best conditions ever in the history of the CQWW CW Contest!

 

CQ WW CW 2013 Log Checking Reports

An email with a link to the Log Checking Report has been sent to everyone who submitted a log for the CQ WW DX Contest CW 2013. The Log Checking Report includes a complete summary of how the final score was calculated and any errors or deductions that may have occurred. We make these reports available so participants can have the opportunity to learn from their mistakes.

How does your accuracy compare to others? The chart below shows the number of errors by percentage and the cumulative percentage of entrants in that bin.

 

WW CW 2013 Error Rates Chart

 

Table. Numeric values for chart

Error Rate bin Number of logs Cumulative %
<0.100% 386 5.19%
0.500% 113 6.71%
1.000% 565 14.30%
2.000% 1658 36.58%
3.000% 1347 54.68%
4.000% 921 67.05%
5.000% 584 74.90%
10.000% 1305 92.43%
20.000% 477 98.84%
30.000% 68 99.76%
40.000% 17 99.99%
More 1 100.00%

For example, there were 1658 logs with an error rate between 1.0 and 2.0%. 36.5% of the total entrants had an error rate of 2.0% or less. The median error rate was 2.7%. This is an amazingly good result when you consider the total number of contacts made during the contest.

A few more statistics from the contest log checking.

 7,442 logs total
5,505,384 QSO total
 205 different countries
 39,950 ( 0.7%) QSO with unique calls
 22,495 (56.3%) unique calls busted 
 55,672 ( 1.0%) dupes
 323 ( 0.0%) Cabrillo format errors
4,871,227 (88.5%) QSO checked against another log
4,729,508 (97.1%) QSO checked good against another log
 73,087 ( 1.5%) busted calls
 22,165 ( 0.5%) busted exchange
 46,467 ( 1.0%) not in log

The scores in the LCR are what will appear in the official results. The results for CQ WW SSB and CW 2013 are scheduled to appear in the May 2014 issue of CQ Magazine.

Please send any questions or comments about your log checking report  at: https://cqww.com/contact.

How fast do people send in WW CW?

Bob Wilson N6TV did some analysis using new columns in the raw data archived by the Reverse Beacon Network.

We finally have an answer to that age old question, “So, how fast do people send Morse code in CQ WW CW?”

Answer:  about 30 WPM

Shown below is the average CW speed of all the RBN spots, by continent (of the DX).
Those African DXpeditioners really know how to QRQ (especially EF8U).  And yes, most slow down a bit on Sunday, even if conditions improve:
           2013 CQ WW CW, Saturday
        ——– Speed (WPM) ——-
Cont    Max    Min      Avg   StdDev       Spots
  AF     53      8     34.0      4.3       61707
  AS     47      5     30.8      4.1      229914
  EU     53      2     31.1      3.6     1578113
  NA     51      1     31.1      3.8      772140
  OC     40      7     30.2      3.6       29966
  SA     49      4     31.8      4.2      124923
—-     —     —     —-     —-     ——-
 Tot     53      1     31.2      3.8     2796763
 
           2013 CQ WW CW, Sunday
        ——– Speed (WPM) ——-
Cont    Max    Min      Avg   StdDev       Spots
  AF     50      6     32.9      4.3       66334
  AS     47      2     30.2      3.8      227485
  EU     51      2     30.2      3.5     1607793
  NA     51      2     29.9      3.6      843113
  OC     41      5     29.7      3.3       31278
  SA     47      6     31.4      3.8      137572
—-     —     —     —-     —-     ——-
 Tot     51      2     30.2      3.6     2913575

 

Do people send slower on the low bands?  Yes, the lower the band, the slower they go.

  2013 CQ WW CW, Saturday
        ——– Speed (WPM) ——-
Band    Max    Min      Avg   StdDev       Spots
 10m     53      5     31.8      4.0      341152
 15m     53      4     31.7      3.7      505217
 20m     51      1     31.6      3.7      574727
 40m     53      1     31.1      3.7      868980
 80m     51      2     30.1      3.5      403785
160m     43      2     28.3      3.5      102902
—-     —     —     —-     —-     ——-
 Tot     53      1     31.2      3.8     2796763
 
           2013 CQ WW CW, Sunday
        ——– Speed (WPM) ——-
Band    Max    Min      Avg   StdDev       Spots
 10m     49      4     30.9      3.9      278449
 15m     50      3     31.0      3.7      484538
 20m     51      2     30.8      3.5      694123
 40m     49      3     30.0      3.4      888032
 80m     46      2     29.4      3.3      443191
160m     47      4     27.3      3.3      125242
—-     —     —     —-     —-     ——-
 Tot     51      2     30.2      3.6     2913575

 

Map showing typical RBN data

The RBN collects data from receivers around the world and stores it into a database. These reports include call, frequency, signal-to-noise ratio, and CW speed. More information about the Reverse Beacon Network is available at http://www.reversebeacon.net/

Thanks to N6TV for sharing his analysis.

CQ WW 2012 Changes to Disciplinary Actions

The official results for the CQ WW DX Contest 2012 have appeared in CQ Magazine. Several questions were received regarding disciplinary actions taken by the CQ WW Contest Committee. After thorough discussion within the Committee the following changes were adopted:

CQWW SSB 2012

The entry for II9P (ops I4AVG, I4VEQ, IT9AUG, IT9CHU, IT9CJC, IT9EQO, IT9GSF, IT9PKO, IV3YYK, ON4LG, S52RU) is changed from Red Card to Yellow Card.

CQWW CW 2012

The entry for LX7I (ops LX2A, DF3VM, DK6WL, DL1QQ, DL5SE, HB9CVQ, PA4N) is changed from Checklog to Yellow Card. The Red Card for DL1QQ is rescinded.

The entry for II2E (ops I2VXJ, IK2EGL, IK2JUB, IK4VET) is changed from Red Card to Yellow Card.

The entry for OL3Z (ops OK1FCJ, OK1FPS, OK1HMP, LZ1RGM) is changed from Red Card to Yellow Card.

The rules for warnings and disqualifications are being updated for 2013. The 2013 rules will implement a new approach to the actions of the CQ WW Contest Committee for warnings, disqualifications, and appeals.

Corrections will appear in the errata of the results and in the online score database.

 

Randy Thompson, K5ZD
Director – CQ WW DX Contest